+ Reply to Thread
Page 9 of 9
FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9
Results 81 to 84 of 84

Thread: Infant Baptism!

  1. #81
    Senior Member daveski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    106
    Amen
    43
    Amened 115 Times in 62 Posts

    Default

    Good discussion! Keep it up! I'm currently reading God of Promise by Horton and he gets to signs and seals of the covenant in chapter 8, so we'll see how that goes.

    G & P,

    d.

  2. The Following 2 Users Say AMEN to daveski For This Useful Post:

    G.R.A.C.E. Preecha (January 4th, 2010), RachelGist (January 7th, 2010)

  3. #82
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bay Area, Ca
    Posts
    971
    Amen
    955
    Amened 391 Times in 248 Posts

    Default

    Hm.

    Which things practiced in the Old Covenants were fullfilments of the Law?

    Thank you.

    (By the way, loving my study on Covenant Theo. Such a blessing!)
    You too broke to afford free grace. - Pastor Jesse Gistand


    New to the site ? Be sure to click on 'Now Taking the Stage' and Introduce Yourself to the community.
    Board RulesOther Frequently Asked QuestionsSuggestions

  4. #83
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bay Area, Ca
    Posts
    971
    Amen
    955
    Amened 391 Times in 248 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by G.R.A.C.E. Preecha View Post
    Baptizo can variously mean pour, sprinkle, dip, immerse - mode of baptism isn't important IMO.

    (*waits for the inevitable link to "but there are other words used for sprinkle and pour"* to which I premptively answer "the problem with that line of argumentation is that you're arguing from a position of what you THINK should be used, not what's actually used in the text. JW's use the same line of argumentation when they go looking for Jesus to directly say "I am God" and when they don't specifically find those three words, despite whatever else is found, they conclude - wrongly - that Jesus isn't God. Instead, there's plenty of archaeological and etymological evidence to show that the word had various meanings even 200 years before Christ. Third, the early church doesn't mention any controversy with the various modes of baptism, showing that this - the mode of baptism- wasn't an issue.)
    Nah. Had that feisty discussion with a friend concerning that years back. And I only asked out of ignorance. Really, I should have searched the scriptures and other sources first. Thanks for your explanation though! Verily 'preciated.


    In a bit. About to get ready to visit my father with my wife.
    Adorable.

    Thanks Preecha.
    You too broke to afford free grace. - Pastor Jesse Gistand


    New to the site ? Be sure to click on 'Now Taking the Stage' and Introduce Yourself to the community.
    Board RulesOther Frequently Asked QuestionsSuggestions

  5. #84
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    168
    Amen
    16
    Amened 17 Times in 15 Posts

    Default

    Its against the blueprints, and quite frankly I find this whole discussion hilarious and quite revealing.

    So... I guess you see my views on it, lol.
    Theologyand.me | @Rinacz | Still learning.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts